This treatise will be written in “Stream of Conscious” in multiple sessions, as is the Way of “Volt's” deliberation with expoundings.

With this treatise, the term “Vir” is being captured and copyrighted, in the manner in which it is being used within this published book. As are the terms “Virka”, “Vehrka”, and “Virya”.

With the term “Vir”, though there is the Latin word meaning “Man”, this is not the limits, and nature of this term, as used in Voltential Productions. The term is specific to Voltential Productions.

This treatise, or rather essay, is not going to make much sense to those either newly acquainted with, or minorly acquainted with that of other works out of Voltential Productions. This is a “cheat piece” of sorts, that can explain some simpler versions of Patterns of the “Way” being proposed throughout the more complex, or rather “compounded” pieces.

It will take some time for the more detailed works to be released. Because of this, given many questions from a handful of folk, yet to be answered... I thought of this CHEAT.

At first glance, some may think this has something to do with “Mandalorian” notions of “the Way”. The Mandalorians, being a combat kind more so than a “Warrior” kind, and being fictional, they have appealed to many. In public, with some males, I will actually joke often about “This is the Way” and/or “Weapons are a part of my Religion”, and they now get it. They get it only to the point of fantasy, and they can not conceive of a “Way” that can actually exist that has these attitudes, as well as core principles.

Saying “This is the Way” is not Mandalorian, but is being used here in the sense of the “Dao”, or “Tao”, as well as the “Dharma”, or “Dhamma” of “Accordant” religions of ancient Central Asia long passed.

Tao, which I shall spell Dao, from here on out, means “Way”, and/or “Methodology”. It means far more than “the Way to the store”, or “the Way to wealth”, or something of that sort. It implies in its rendering the “Way of Heaven”, which even before that... meant “the Solar Way”.

This was contrary to another “Way”, that of the “Way of the Earth”, the “Way of the 'ground', the 'soil'”, or that of the “humble Way”, the “human Way”.

In ancient times, “The Way” preached of two kinds: Earthlings, and Solar Kinds. The Earthlings, or the Earth kind, did not, and does not develop in “Ways”, or that is “methodologies”. Knowing this term “method” is a part of the Dao, and/or the “Way” is key.

When the term is left as “Way”, it can be said there are all sorts... but this is not what the Dao means. It means the “Way of Heaven”, or the “Solar Way”. This then means the “Ratiocinative” or the “Methodical Way”.

So then, when “This is the Way” is said, or thought, it has this implied added element: this is the Way of “Ratiocination”, or the “Methodical”. Such Ratiocination, or Methodical Reasoning is to be in “Accord” with that of “Actuality”, often called “Reality”.

Therefore, the primary element of this Way is “Accordance”, which is through submission to Actuality, and not the overriding of Actuality with one's desires to be amused, or engage in fantasy.

Meaning, what one desires, wants, and thinks they need is not a primary, as it is in the “Way of the Earth”, which has Earthlings, who have no way... but are SUBJECTS to its ways. This means in the realm of decision making, an Earthling is without strategy, and a set of definable and deliberate tactics at Control, Management, Manipulation and Entertainment.

A “Way” is defined by its set of strategies and tactics that informs its decision making process, which has the aim of advancing, and enhancing one's Control, Management, and Manipulation of the condition and self, towards that of the “Command” often called “Sovereignty”, or Sole Reign.

When it is said, “This is the Way”, by any “Votary” of this Way, this is all that is meant, and more. It does not mean a UNIVERSAL way, that would include both the “Way of the Earth” and the “Way of the Sun”, but only means, THIS IS THE WAY OF THE SOLAR.

One then has to determine, if they are characterized by the Earth, the moon, or the SUN. Where one is of the other two, Earth, and moon, then they have no place in consideration of the SOLAR Way, and the only place they will seek to have is subversive, and undermining.

One who is not naturally inclined to the Solar Way can not grasp its “Way”, its “Methodologies”. They can only, out of repugnance, fight reactively against it, and often while pretending in fantasy to be a part of it.

Fantasy is mostly an issue in this Way, and ought to be avoided. However, most who are, and will be reading this, will be doing so ignorantly, motivated by a sense that it offers fantasy like the rest of any works would about any so called “Way”.

The works will be targeted for the reader, or listener's DESIRE to be SEDUCED; and Seduction is a form of ENTERTAINMENT, with the CERTAIN kind of FRAME of MIND being maintained, being one that is DISTRACTED, through ESCAPISM, in the name of a RELIEF, from the defeated state of IGNORANT living.

The form of ENTERTAINMENT in which Voltential Productions deals in, is called ENGAGING. There are three categories of Entertainment:

 

1. Amusement

2. Seduction

3. Engagement

 

Engagement can be broken up into three more categories:

 

1. Physical

2. Mental

3. Intellectual

    

Mental and Intellectual are not the same. Fantasy occurs on account of the Mental, and Mental is just the raw thinking categories and abilities. Whereas, Intellectual is thinking methodically, and based upon knowledge points. Mental can be based on belief, opinion, wants, desires, interests, escapism, and so on. Mental is not Intellectual. Intellectual is all thought founded upon skill, competency, and mastery in dealing with KNOWNS, and that which is evident either physically, and/or dialectically.

Entertainment that engages the Intellect is RARE. Entertainment that can engage the Mental — and that means stimulate it — as well as the Physical is more present. However, most Entertainment that engages the Mental, only does so on the level of Amusement, and/or Seduction, and does not engage it in the sense of stimulate and exercise its strengths. Many may think they deal in Engaging Mental Entertainment, but they do not.

The way to tell is the targets and condition of the Entertainment. When one is talking about “actuality”, or facts and things, and others, in the sense of “what's going on”, and in that talk, they are making light of it, mocking it, or combating it in opposition, thus the emotion of REPUGNANCE, then it is AMUSEMENT. If instead, the activity and condition is not about “actuality”, but some fantasy that is not based in knowledge or some science, then it is Seduction.

In the absence of a “Methodology”, a “Way”, it can not be said that the form of Entertainment is Engagement of the Intellect, though so long as skill and development of the Mental sort is present, and not in the name of opposition or fantasy, then it could be said, engaging the Mental is occurring.

This can be what is occurring, for Entertainment, when one has a hobby, or is developing a skill, is getting better at something. Absent this standard of Advancement, it could hardly be called Entertainment of engaging the Mental.

Sports are a good example of this. Often, sports require, when there is competition, that of engaging these two bodies, the Physical and the Mental, and evidence of this is in performance, and in how it will not all be the same. Those more engaged often win the competition. It can be said sports are primarily physical tools, and secondary, the mental “see through” in the use of the tools. So then begets the order of Engagement... Physical to Mental, versus Mental to Physical.

It is far more common that an Engagement needs the Physical tools first, the material foundation first, and then the Mental serves that foundation, than it is the Mental is the foundation, and the Physical serves the Mental.

Intellectual Engagement is just that. It is born out of the Mental as the foundation, and the Physical as the servant of that foundation. Intellectual Engagement is not void of the Physical or the Mental. It requires the order of Mental as the foundation, towards Methodology and Validity, and the Physical to carry one in strength through the actualization of such an “Engagement”.

On account of this, there are many differences. However, for the most part, few are even numerically engaged in the third kind of Entertainment. If you, the reader, do not engage in any physical standards or mental standards of skill, and competency, where you can measure movement from one level to the next... then by default, this means your only sense of ENTERTAINMENT can, and will be of the first two: Amusement, and Seduction.

Meaning, the absence of physical and mental skill targets CONFIRMS, beyond your self reporting, what realms of Entertainment you are limited to.

When you are limited to 1 and 2, Amusement and/or Seduction, then when you have ENGAGING Entertainment upon you, you will convert it over into first SEDUCTION. But when that Engaging Entertainment demands too much from you, and thus, does not support your “fantasy”, you will fall to your repugnance, an emotion, and you will instead convert the Engaging Entertainment over to AMUSEMENT.

This is the “Way of the Earth”. It is not “your Way”, for you do not have a “Way”, but certainly, a “Way” has you. More often than not, this is on account of the NORMS that are compelled through the collective social body, I call SAM. SAM stands for the SOCIETY ADVANCED by the MAJORITY. This is the “collective hive mind”. In the absence of METHODOLOGY, you are using SAM.

There is no ESCAPING, in Seduction, this notion. You do not say, “Oh, SAM, yes, I do not like SAM, err go, I am no longer using SAM in my thinking”. This is FANTASY based, and the error with Seduction. By merely hearing of something, and thinking you can make a decision, and arrogantly doing so, you form a DELUSION.

If you can not sit down, right now, and DETAIL, DEFINE, and DELIBERATE on methods used for all your decision making, then... you only have SAM, that is, the “Way of the collective hive mind” guiding your thinking.

This means, mirrored and mimicked notions, from first your familiars, or family and peers, and then your COMPELLED experience through the SCHOOLS — and no, alternative schools do not exempt one from this. No, homeschooling does not exempt one from this. In those alternative, and/or private schools, there was SAM, through the teachers. In one's homeschooling, done in pods, or by FAMILY members, it was SAM coming through those educated teachers.

Methodology will not be the primary in ANY SCHOOL. Behavioral modification is the point of SCHOOLING. It is the domesticating, the taming, and the rearing of a wild animal to be a BEAST of BURDEN. This is the “Way of EARTHLINGS”, who are all “slavers” getting each other to serve their EMOTIONAL DIFFIDENCE and desire for Amusement, and Seduction.

When you, the reader, turns to my works, Voltential Productions, the theme of the works is instantly translated into your SEDUCTION mental scheme. However, you do not have this as a “Way”, but this “Way of the Earth” has you. You are a “SUBJECT”, and it is not the “truth” that shall set ye free... but that of dealing in evidence, methodically, that is key to liberation. These are not the same.

Failure to have a DEFINABLE method of thought, language, and “Way” is EVIDENCE of having no WAY. And NO, the Dao is not the “WAY of NO WAY”, in this sense. That expression is better translated to mean, the Dao, when Accordant, is the “Way of Flow”, and when one is in the flow, deliberation about, or upon the Way is not needed.

Whilst in flow, the Way is acting through the actor, and the actor is a “Vessel” of the Way, a “Servant of the Way”, a “Reflection of the Way”. This flow can not be achieved absent a Way. A Way, or set of methods governing strategies and tactics of flow development, is a precursor to the actual Way.

Flow is about challenge and skill coming to be matched Accordantly. One can not form this match, absent a realm that requires skill, and hierarchy. Meaning, that realm has levels. Skill level must be able to be advanced. If the realm does not have the chance of Advancement, then that realm is a ritualistic realm, not a realm of SKILL.

Most do not engage realms of skill. The most loudest realm of skill that is a part of “This Way”, the Solar Way... is that of the “Martial Realm”. However, “We” of this “Way” use the term “Valiant” in place of the Earth term “martial”. The Valiant Realm has a martial component, but it has an ETHOS. It is far more than combat, and combat arms. But in this intro area, this is the way to first think of it.

Martial arms, and combat development, like sports, have a clear sense of Physical and Mental Engagement. It is Engaging in the direction of Physical as the primary, then Mental. This, as the “Way”, is the Way of cultivating the “Way”. One does not engage the Mental first, and then the Physical, when they are a Votary in development.

It is directional development of the one becomes two, so that the two once again, can become one. “We”, of these Vows of this Way, call this “Ungyo Do”, or the “Dao of Ungyo”.

But this complicates things. The “Way of Valiance” is the first step in this Way that is Solar. One must engage in some combat physical practice. That can be any martial art, but boxing is the first step. If the option was given in regards to where to start, martial arts of the modern sense are not the place. Martial arts are mostly composed of FANTASY, with SEDUCTIVE fantasy teachers selling their dance routines as COMBAT. The most FUNDAMENTAL art of COMBAT is two grappling, and boxing.

These develop the “Way of Valiance” only as the first step. They are not the “Way”. They are the “Way towards the Way”, and in this case, the “Way of Valiance”. A Votary, either three times a week minimum, engages the Physical in accordance with a combat practice. One who does not do so, at minimum three times a week, is not a Votary.

One who does so daily is a lived Votary. They are living in Validity, the start of Valiance. Daily is the goal for all practices, but there is a “Way” on to the “Way” that can take time. But that “Way” towards is not “Thee Way”, and never ought to be seen as such.

Many can try to be along a “Way” and do small steps, that they become limited to... yet in fantasy, they wish to say, “This is my Way”. Yet, they do not Advance in and through it. This is because, it was not their “Way”, but it was their fantasy, more often than not, for social inclusion, and social attachments.

If one does not engage the Physical, whatever sense of the Mental they think they are engaging is in Amusement or fantasy. Those of a weak, and neglected body will be by default delusional. There is no such thing as a fat Votary of this “Way”. There is no such thing as a sloth Votary of this “Way”.

A historical example can be found in one of the ancestors of this “Way”, called Bodhidharma. Bodhidharma was of Sogdian descent, not Indian, and he was often called “The Blue-Eyed Barbarian”, among the Han Chinese. He was seen as Buddhist, though to him, and his Kind, this merely meant “of the Dhamma”, the “Law”, the “Accord”. They are not Buddhist; they are “Carriers” of the “Law”, the “Accord”, in the way they be.

Bodhidharma, in the mythology of Shaolin, is the one who got them to engage the Physical. Prior to him coming to the area, they were Buddhist monks who engaged in Seduction, or that is fantasy, as most religions merely are. To call them “Mental Engagement” will be an error. Mental Engagement deals in Actuality, not fantasy.

That is why, it is easiest spoken of in sports, that follow the Physical to the Mental. The Mental serving material needs means, it has to be in accordance with what is. An athlete that is competitive, but decides to use a fantasy strategy to get better, will be one who does not get far, unless their opponents are doing the same.

Oddly, in fantasy martial arts, this can often be the case. That with fantasy rules, both can disobey actuality, and succeed. Oddly then, most of the time, to survive and succeed in social orders, which are mostly based in fantasy, one needs to play in the fantasy. Actuality and obedience to it often gets one marked as an outsider, and they incur the repugnance of the fantasy players.

The monks of Shaolin, even to this day, merely memorize the fantasy of Buddhist thought — and Buddhist thought, like other religious thought, is mostly fantasy.

Some, based on their own nature, can read such, and after Physical Engagement, or “Chi development”, then come to reinterpret that Dhamma, or the Accordance.

This was the point, and key to why Bodhidharma had the monks begin Physical, or rather Chi or Vital development. One must be with a physical frame that is battle ready, to truly come to mentally contemplate the Dhamma. One who is weak in body, like most Buddhists, especially Western Buddhists are, can never truly contemplate the Dhamma, because the Dhamma requires Vigor, Vitality, Vigilance, and Valiance.

The Virtues needed for the Dhamma are extreme, and mental escape artists into Seduction will never be near to it, regardless of what rank they hold in fantasy words, and costumes they wear, and communities they have alliances with.

The martial element of this Way is not Shaolin, but is certainly in accord with the Ancient Ancestors of Sogdiana, in which Shaolin is mythologically connected with. This is to say, what has the appearance of the Eastern martial arts, in this Way, is not “Han” originated. The Han received it from a different from them kind. Origination, however, means nothing.

Kind does, however, mean most everything.

Shaolin today is fantasy. Most of it is theater, with “martial dance” as the primary. Some only learn its martial dance, and then some become “Warrior Monks”, only in the sense of adding to the martial dance that of memorizing and recitation of the Sutta, and/or that of the “Buddhist” thought. Grasping it is not the variable here. But remembrance is. They then call that combination, a “Warrior Monk”.

The “Solar Way” would not see it this way. In this Way, the Way of the Vir, Shaolin, like most things, is fantasy, and that is not an insult, though certainly, repugnant kinds will take it that way, and launch a triggered defense.

It is fantasy for ways that can only be made clear upon completing any sense of this “Way” being written, from which it can be said all of my judgements are shaped from.

With that note, “This Way” is not a universal Way.

Because it is not a universal Way, it would beg the question, to whom, or what shall it apply?

“This is the Way” means “This is the Way of the Vir”. The Vir is not a Mandalorian. The Vir is not a Shaolin. But the Vir certainly is more akin to a “Warrior Monk” than all of them.

But this is not the “Way of the Warrior Monk”. None of these near in likeness can say what the “Way” is, because none of them are “This Way”.

The formula to cheat with, with this notion, requires the categories of Min be introduced.

The term “Min” is a shortened term from the term “hominid”. Hominid is shortened to Min, but not merely as a shortened, but this term “Min” used to be used in ancient times, to denote the general kind in which all bipedal, with upright carriage, freed up arms, with opposable thumbs for manipulation, mostly hairless, and endowed with abstract thought beings, shared in common.

A chimp is not a Min. The abstract thought was mostly what would come to make chimps, perhaps Homo, in relation, but not Min. Absent abstract thought means, not a Min.

But there were many species of hominids, and therefore, of Min. Some in history were called Neanderthal, Cro-Magnon, Homo floresiensis, Denisovan, and so on. And in the modern so-called “human” DNA are remnants of ancestors having mixed with them, showing, though a different species, they were more akin than not.

But most of you will never have thought about this. That fantasy works, supposing different “races” of beings, are actually founded in reality. Hobbits, in the general sense, were real. Maybe not with their culture, and ways. But as far as the hobbit form is concerned, Homo floresiensis has been nicknamed after them, on account of likeness.

And then, there were species of Min, or hominids, who have left no fossil evidence behind, and can only be considered on account of genetic remnants. They call these “ghost ancestors”, and “ghost species”. That one or a few have been proposed, means there could have been many, and what is “modern-day human” is certainly a fusion of ancient long gone kinds.

A Neanderthal was not a human. It was a hominid, but not a human.

A Denisovan was not a human. It was a hominid, but not a human.

A Vir is not a human, but it is a hominid.

This term “HUMAN”, you have heard and used your whole life, had you grunting. You never actually considered its meaning. You look at all the hominids, that is Min around you, and you have thought “gruntingly”, “We be humans”. Because you have mimicked and mirrored the grunts of SAM, with most of your words.

But in this Solar Way, “We” of this Way do not deal in grunting terms, but must be able to deliberate upon, and define the essence of the terms we are signing or uttering. One who can not DEFINE their terms that they use, is not one who is of this Way. This is an Engagement of the Mental that is essential to this Way. This does not mean, having a standard and universal definition. This means, able to break down the single term into its primary ingredients that are traits and attributes. This is what a definition does.

The present example is “human”. “Human” does not mean, and never has meant “hominid”. It does not mean “Min”. “Human” is from Humanus, in Latin, which has its essence made clear from the rooted term humus. The essence of humus is specific. It means “mud”, “dirt”, “earth”, and “ground”. If you were to grunt and point at the soil and the earth, the low ground, you would grunt humus.

Humanus are those beings who are “of the Earth”, from the “ground”, but it had an added ingredient to it. It was a term that the Humanus did not have a sense of for its self, but a term born out of the notion of “Solar beings”, or “Heavenly beings” humans would later call “gods”.

A human or Humanus does not know the terms it mimics, and mirrors on grunting levels to navigate social orders it was not involved in constructing. Humans, that is Humanus, have, and perhaps always will be... a subject species of little thought.

In this “Way”... “We” are not a we. “We” are not the same, though in the Way of Humanus — a Way that is not theirs, but they are its — they see all things limited to how far they see themselves.

So you can not say what the word “human” means; you would need to “grunt” and point at yourself, and others who have similar physical ratios, eyes, mouth, ears, head, body, arms, legs, feet, and walk around clothed. You just have no idea what your terms mean.

But the dichotomy is in the word. Human is Earthling, of the soil and mud, LOWLY, as opposed to the GODS who are in the Heavens, above, and HIGHER.

Human is a status, and it's an accurate one. Of the Humanus Min, the grunted value is HUMILITY. Meaning, one who is “GOOD” is one who does not think themselves better or higher. This is how you all say HUMILITY; but one who does think themselves above requires acts of HUMILIATION, and as your sick kind would say... “to take them down a notch”, with that “downturn” being based on how the rest of you feel, and limited to your judgements. You call this “equalizing”, “equality”, and “equity”.

This is why the term Humanus makes sense of the majority of MIN on this planet. The MAJORITY, the MASSES, the MULTITUDES have LOW SELF-ESTEEM, or sense of WORTH. If you have LOW self-esteem that you CAN NOT alleviate... it is because you are HUMANUS, you are HUMAN.

The LOW SENSE is the primary ingredient of being human. Having others “RULE” and “govern you”, outsourcing Protection and services to others, and having no qualms with this, is EVIDENCE of being human, or HUMANUS. Only a HUMANUS outsources PROTECTION.

To be HUMBLE is make oneself “LOWER”. TO HUMILIATE another, is to make them feel lower. Low feelings, and Sense of Self, are innate to the Humanus, and that is why they have been called EARTHLINGS, even by Early Buddhists, as opposed to the SOLAR.

The SOLAR Kind did not LOWER the Humanus, or HUMILIATE them. The SOLAR Kind observed in Humanus, that it can not ELEVATE itself, but is inflicted with the DISEASE of HUMILITY.

The Solar Kind did not know to call this “DIFFIDENCE”. Instead, they saw that their Kind differed, in that they were born in CONFIDENCE. They affirmed what was in them as a Solar Kind, a heightened Kind, but could not grasp out of their own nature, this diffidence, this base emotion that defines exactly what it is to be human.

The formula here, I call “Humanus Emotional Kinetics”. The updated list numbers SEVEN, and these are called the primary emotions.

The Humanus academics list six. THEY, not “WE” of this “WAY”, call them:

 

1. Fear/insecurity

2. Anger

3. Disgust

4. Despair

5. Surprise

6. Joy

 

The academic sense of the emotions is rather useless, and this can be detected in their books about emotions, with Paul Ekman being one of their main shaman presenters.

I have reworked these notions with the use of “Ancestral” and “Ancient thought”, given an English coverage. In this Way, the Way of the Vir, there are seven primary emotions, in which all the other emotions are born out of.

These SEVEN emotions are:

 

1. Diffidence

2. Anxiety

3. Repugnance

4. Disgust

5. Despair

6. Favored ignorance

7. Entertainment: Amusement, Seduction, Engagement (Physical, Mental)

 

The difference in the list will be expounded upon in the treatise IPSEITY. For now, one will need to look at the terms, and discern in their differences. They are rather mostly massively different.

In the formula above, this is HUMANUS Kinetics. The emotions of a VIR are not the same as the emotions of a Humanus. Numbering SEVEN, and in transmuted form, they are:

 

1. Confidence/Devotion/Vovere

2. Vitality/Vigor

3. Valiance

4. Veracity

5. Vigilance

6. Validity

7. Entertainment: Engagement (Mental, Physical to Intellectual)

 

These are called kinetic differences in the emotions, or the “Pathos” body of the “individual”.

Humanus and Vir are not the same species of Min. Both are Min, but a Humanus is not a Vir.

This term “Vir” is often said to be the Latin equivalent to the grunted notion of “Man”.

But the term “Man”, which you have used and heard grunted, is also not synonymous with “human”. A “human” is not a “Man”; but “Man” is something that comes first perhaps from being human.

“Man” is not from the word “human”. It is not “hu-man”, and the notion that “man” is in the word “human” is phonetic, but not etymological. Humus, and “Humanus” have huma unseparated.

“Manu”, and “Manus”, is from Latin and Sanskrit for “hand”. But when they used this term, it did not mean the physical hand in and of itself, when marking a species of Min. It means a “craftsman” who uses their hands to augment, to build, to construct, to control, to manage the material realm. In simple form, “Manu” means an “Intelligent being”.

A Manu might be a type of Humanus, for I am not settled on this yet. But it is not a Humanus, when it is a Manu realized. Humanus is not an Intelligent being, and barely any of you have ever MASTERED a CRAFT. You may have perfected a routine around Management of a utility, but this is not the same. MASTERY has its own ESSENCE, that is rather UNIVERSAL to all in which it is applied.

One who has this essence of mastery known, would inherently not be the master of one thing, but a POLYMATH, one who has mastered many disciplines. In the absence of a polymath, I do not call one a MASTER. A mere craftsman is not a master, though they may have perfected their material craft. A “Master” is Mental, Physical, and not merely Utilis, or based in utility and servile arts.

Vir does not mean “man”, but in English, when they seek to give a familiar term, this is what they do. Vir can not be translated, and any who does translate it, is either doing so ignorantly, having merely looked up the term for the first time to exercise their repugnance in refutation, or they do so knowingly, under the same emotion, as a means to SUBVERT, UNDERMINE, and COMBAT... that is, bring it all down a notch, and HUMBLE it through HUMILIATION.

Vir is not a term in which anyone is using. Not in the English speaking word. English speakers and writers have no use for Vir. Therefore, in my use of it, as the most ancient and accurate term for those whom this “Way” applies to... I am the Authority when it comes to defining it.

A hint to defining Vir, is in the term “Virtue”. When you have either grunted, or heard others grunting this term, you translated it to what is “good”. A Virtue is “what is good”, and a vice is “what is bad”.

But as commons among Humanus, the terms “Virtue” and “vice” do not in practice mean much of anything to you. Or until now, they have not. Instead, you exist in a realm of Utilis, that is utility, or usefulness. Virtue and vice can then only be translated over in your mind to “useful” to me, or “useless” to me.

But in the term “Virtue”, there are two words... “Vir”, and “itus”. Itus means “The Way” or “A Way”, and itus is “Our”, of this Way, meaning of “the DAO”, as I have defined it. Virtue, from Viritus, the name of this “WAY”, means the “Way of the Vir”. Virtue never meant the “Way of Humanus”, and how they ought to be. The term for that is “humane”.

“Humane” is based on the human Emotional Kinetics above. What is humane is based on serving those emotions.

Virtue is based on the Vir Emotional Kinetics above. What is Virtue is based on expressing those emotions.

“Expressing” when it is “Virtue”, not “serving” like it is with “humane”.

Humaneness is shaped by a sense of SERVICE and SACRIFICE to the COLLECTIVE.

Virtue is shaped by a sense of Expression of Vigor, Vitality, Veracity, Vigilance, Validity, and Valiance, from and for one's self, that has, as a byproduct, the enhancement of the conditions of others, in the game, or the social sphere of Virtue. There is no SERVICE and SACRIFICE to others as a VIRTUE.

This is NOT the WAY of the VIR, and never was. When one speaks of service and sacrifice as Virtuous, they are grunting about a term they know nothing about. They ought to use the term “humane”, and “humanness”.

That there are these two different terms ought to make it clear, that some thinkers of old knew the difference. Yet, as one can read a great deal of works by modern so-called thinkers and “philosophers”, what one will not read, anywhere else, is this distinction.

The reason why one will not read of this distinction, is because thus far... all of your writers in SAM, or from and of SAM, under its possession, as its subjects, are ALL Humanus, and not one of them is VIR.

In this cheat called The Advent of the Vir, you will be hearing of “The Way of the Vir” as it is written by a VIR; not by an academic shaman made Brahmin who seeks to tell you through fantasy means about some dead Ancient and their ways, based on the limits of their humane consideration of their own kind.

These formulas of the Emotional Kinetics determine how you read all observable phenomenon. For those who are interested in my works, because of the connections I make with Buddhism, know this... Early Buddhism would be in agreement with me, on all that is said here.

The Saka were the kind the Brahmins of India and the Silk Road stole their novelties from, to make the new religion Buddhism, and spread it for commercial reasons.

The Saka, or this particular Sacaen group, which differed from others, were VIR. They were from the ancient lost group called Vehrka, in the Avestan tongue, or those who walked with wolves, like the Hyrcanians in Greek literature. They were not Saka general, and they were NOT Scythian general.

There were many cultures, and ways, among the general Scythians, and these Saka, the Aristoi of sorts, did not share in those general practices. They were a full-on MARTIAL, or WARRIOR Kind. The Saka had no kings, therefore, no princes like Prince Siddhartha. They had no luxury lifestyles, hence no castled existence of a Siddhartha myth, and they had no priests or shamans... hence, not compatible with the Brahmins who would control the narrative called Buddhism later.

The Saka also had no LAWS, because the DHAMMA, or the Law, was written on their NATURE. They were considered by ancient thinkers and philosophers to be the greatest example of VIRTUE, on account that it was their “Way” that began any notion of “Virtue”.

When the ancient Greek thinkers were using the term “Virtue”, they used the version called Areti, which would develop the ideas of Arete. Those of its nature were called Aristoi. When the Early Buddhists used the term Arya, it meant the same thing as the Greek Areti. It did not mean a “race of Men” or beings, based upon their physical make and model, and certainly not the way in which a modern racialist would use the term “Aryan”.

It was equivalent to saying, those born with a NOBLE CHARACTER, or born in CONFIDENCE. All of the Buddhist teachings in the early stage were addressed to this supposed Kind. It was to those born in CONFIDENCE, of a NOBLE nature... “This is the Law”, or this is the “WAY”.

This means, it did not apply to those born in diffidence, and the reasoning for this, is because the Emotional Kinetics from diffidence, listed above, will impede the Path, or the Way, and make one violate the “LAW”. Therefore, one who is born in diffidence can not be one who interprets, translates, or expounds on the Law. For them to do so, they will inevitably CORRUPT it.

How one is born is based on those who came before them, either their direct progenitors, or on account of atavism, some distant ancestors whose form they now share in “kind”.

Of the present collective and common forms, absolutely none of them are born from the nature and Kind of the VIR. There is no Vir stock in “KIND” walking this Earth as present, which is why it should be of no surprise that there is no “common Virtue”, or any group living Virtuously — with yes, these Virtues yet to be defined.

The Virtues of a Vir are their emotions, not their Reasoning. I have listed those emotions, and from these formulas, so much more can be expounded. The Emotional Kinetics reveal all about BEHAVIOR. From them, all else is inferred.

Atavism, which is a phenomenon when one is a throwback to previous settings of their ancestors, is the actual meaning behind fantasy “reincarnation”. Reincarnation is fantasy. When one matches their progenitors and shares in the same exact temperament, and follows the same path, it can only be fantasy to say they were different in some other past incarnation.

When one is born in modern conditions, and they are not like their progenitors, but they have an inner Vocation towards a different temperament, this is likely on account of atavism. This means, though your physical form was born to these progenitors of the here and now, your make and model of form and mind is not based on them.

If you live like them, you will suffer, because this will be a failure to identify your own nature, temperament, and essence, to which is the instruction on how you ought to live. A Humanus ought to live humanely, but what this can only mean, will also mean, a Humanus will always suffer in servitude and sacrifice, for this is the Humanus Way.

This is the meaning of “life is suffering”. This is true for Humanus. “Life is suffering” is not a part of “Our”, the Vir, Way.

The Vir, instead, through their emotions, says... “Life is War”, which means conflict that requires and demands a Warrior in order for the result of a “Life of War” to be a “Life of Accordance”. Accordance, not peace, is what a “Warrior of this Way” seeks, and that “Accord”, to a human in their diffidence, and anxiety, will seem like “peace”, but this is not the “Way”.

WARFARE, under the direction of Virtue, would mean warfare would be uncommon. This, because VICTORY is in ACCORDANCE, and when one is Victorious, there are no more enemies in opposition and in position to control and manage one towards TYRANNY.

“Life is War” is not pessimistic. It is prescriptive. When one realizes life is war, then they realize the directive to be a Warrior; and when they discover what that means, and bring it into actualization, it is not WAR they seek, and engage in, but VICTORY.

The actual expression “Life is War”, versus “Life is suffering”, to the Vir, means “Life is Victory”.

The actual meaning to the Vir, of what humans think of life as suffering, means the Humanus life is a life of defeat.

The two expressions are therefore altered. Either as a Humanus:

 

Life is defeat.

 

Or as a Vir:

 

Life is Victory.

 

This is temperament.

In diffidence, life will be defeat.

In confidence, or rather devotion, life will be Victorious.

This is the actual meaning of “Life is War”, because one's temperament then determines where they stand in the outcome of life... defeated, or Victorious.

This is the cheat in that formula of consideration. Attitude from temperament is almost everything.

With the Humanus Kinetics, they have an offshoot from anxiety that is very significant, and defines humanness.

From diffidence, their sixth Kinetics is “favored ignorance”. This is because diffidence is directionally a mistrust, and/or lack of trust in certainty. This starts by seeing uncertainty in conditions. Then, uncertainty in others in the conditions. Then, uncertainty in oneself.

All of this uncertainty, breeds conditional uncertainty in the sense of knowledge, or the knowable. One does not deal in knowledge when they are in diffidence. They deal in belief and opinion that can either be founded upon knowledge, and the known, or not.

Knowledge is not required by those in diffidence, in order for them to form their sense of things, though to some degree, they must use some knowns.

Those born in diffidence, that of Humanus as a whole, will not TRUST knowledge, and therefore, will certainly not devote themselves to it. The sixth Kinetics of favored ignorance means, Humanus will favor ignorance over knowledge, because ignorance is often what they escape judgement through. This, some call “playing innocent”, or the “natural”, which means “childlike”. To be childlike is to be “innocently ignorant”.

Humanus does not VALUE knowledge beyond its usefulness to the rest of their emotions.

The Way of the Vir, and this is “That Way”... holds in the sixth Kinetics, born out of devotion called confidence, that of VALIDITY. This is the term “We” of this “Way” use for “knowledge”. It means a strong and certain sense of things. This is what it means to be born in confidence. It does not mean “faith” or a “blind trust”.

It means an attraction to what is Valid, strong, and verifiable, and an inclination to retain the Valid, make use of the Valid, and expand. This is about ATTRACTION and AVERSION. The Humanus has an AVERSION to what is VALID, if what is Valid conflicts with their Emotional Kinetics.

The Vir has their Emotional Kinetics based around their DEVOTION for the VALID. ALL of the other emotions of the Vir are born from this devotion, and their character requires it.

Vigilance is born out of being AWAKE to what is VALID, alert, with situational awareness, and begets GUARDIANSHIP over the Valid.

Veracity is that of the expression of the Vir, which is in its name, and this expression is not “speaking truth to power”; it is that of a “Devoted expression to what is VALID”. This is Physical expression, Mental expression, and Intellectual expression.

Veracity is a Vir trait; not a human trait. It does not mean uttering truths, and words alone. It is more so Acta non Verba. Actions, more than words. When it is actions more than words, it is Veracity, but the words, the Verba, are to be strongly correlated to the actions, and the living.

Verba is the “word” of a Vir. Humans deal in words. The Vir deal in Verba, and by now, the reader ought to see that Latin was some odd language that seemed based around this notion of some Kind called the Vir, but with humans looking back, they thought that just meant “man”, and with “Virtue”, that just meant “manliness”. Oh, how wrong you all have been.

But here I am, an atavist Vir, now in the flesh, to correct this, and “REINCARNATE” the Way of the Vir.